this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
878 points (95.4% liked)

Political Memes

5432 readers
2639 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 30 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Still need infrastructure for mass transit.

Busses still need roads and rails need maintenance.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 29 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Buses dont need multi-lane highways and massive interchanges, neither do trains...

[–] Million@lemmy.zip 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm not for the highways, but trains need train stations and large rail yards and big storage and maintenance areas, and whole new set of machinery and infrastructure to maintain.

Operators for trains and tracks and other systems.

Its not just "lay some track and buy a train", and you are not saying that either.

Right decision imo to aim for that in the long run tho!

[–] warm@kbin.earth 10 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, I mean that's where the money should be spent, not on highway changes.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Trains still need some pretty massive interchanges, just look at any megabase in Factorio. There are literally books of blueprints to deal with any interchange you could possibly need for your trains.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Rail takes up some space, but only at terminating stations. The tracks themselves for 99% of the journey are much more space efficient than roads. We can't compare factorio to real life aha, we are transporting people instead of cargo and over much larger distances.

Besides, USA has a lot of space, that wasn't really the issue, it was the spending of money on the wrong infrastructure.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

We’re very much also transporting cargo, but I don’t know anything about factorio or trains, so I don’t know if that’s a large distinction

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

In Factorio the only passenger on the trains is the player character known as "the engineer," and if your play style is anything like mine, you can run faster than your trains, so they just ship cargo.

I was being a bit facetious by bringing up Factorio, it's just my go to use case for train path designing, since Railroad Tycoon basically doesn't exist any more.

Also their point on distances stands since the largest Factorio maps would scale to be several hundred to a thousand miles across.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

~~Trains still need some pretty massive interchanges, just look at any megabase in Factorio. There are literally books of blueprints to deal with any interchange you could possibly need for your trains.~~

Replied to the wrong comment.