this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
-18 points (29.5% liked)
United States | News & Politics
7186 readers
1789 users here now
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The NYT is only listing the third party people so after Trump wins they can go "If only 100% of third party voters had voted for Kamala (and maybe moved to a different state) Kamala would have won! 😭" instead of going "if 1% of Republicans in 3 states had voted for Kamala she would have won! 😭" which would make more sense since she's campaigning with the last Republican president and running on a basically GOP platform of endless war, tax cuts, a big beautiful wall...