Privacy

31872 readers

555 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

[Matrix/Element]Dead
Discord

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

What's your opinion on telegram from a foss and privacy perspective? (feddit.it)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by dontblink@feddit.it to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

54 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I see i can find a foss version on f-droid, and that's something not a lot of social networks can have, i don't really like all the crypto bullshit and ads testing they've been up to lately, but still looks better to me compared to what Reddit have done lately or what other platforms have done in these years..

I don't know about their privacy feature, but i wouldn't trust their chat as for as far as i knew they were not end to end encrypted some time ago (except for secret chats).

Anyway it still looks like one of the at least still decent platforms out there, or am i wrong?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Somewhere between WhatsApp and Signal. It has FOSS clients, hands over user data only under extraordinary circumstances (terrorism and child abuse, afaik), and runs on pretty much any hardware. The last two points make it very popular in eastern Europe and most of Asia. The main problem with Telegram is that normal chats are not end to end encrypted, and instead use a weaker encryption algorithm. Secure chats are e2e encrypted, but are not on by default.

Overall, it is used by opposition parties in countries like Russia, Belarus and Iran for day to day stuff, so it is fairly secure. Of course, if you are a reporter or activist who has a lot of enemies, you could get something even more secure.

[–] KLISHDFSDF@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Overall, it is used by opposition parties in countries like Russia, Belarus and Iran for day to day stuff, so it is fairly secure

I think this is overselling the "privacy" aspect of storing your personal messages on a server where the admins have complete access without you ever knowing if/what they're doing with it.

Make no mistake, Telegram is as "private" as Facebook. They have access to all your data and as that data grows, it grows in value. It's only a matter of time before they directly or indirectly exploit this (or get compromised) and all your "privacy" is out the window.

No hate towards Telegram, I'm sure its a great platform, but people should at least be aware that it's basically the Pepsi to Facebook's Coke.

[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

It isn't perfect, but I think there is a difference between a company that currently gives user data to advertisers and authoritarian governments, and one that hasn't done any of that so far. There sure is a 'trust me bro' element, but they have had to relocate from Russia to Dubai because they refused to hand over opposition politicians' chats. That's a pretty big commitment to privacy.