this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
-46 points (18.9% liked)

Programming

17291 readers
200 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
snowe@programming.dev
Ategon@programming.dev
MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz
-46
Ghostty 1.0 is Coming (programming.dev)
submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by CodiUnicorn@programming.dev to c/programming@programming.dev
32 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SuperFola@programming.dev 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Kitty is mentioned once in the article and that’s it. Doesn’t even mention its downside and how ghostty is so much better according to them.

It’s a great project and all, but I’d love if people could stop stomping on others work just to appear better.

[–] tun@lemm.ee -1 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] SuperFola@programming.dev 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Only says it’s fast on some specific benchmarks against alacrity. Not talking about why alacrity or kitty would not work on Linux/mac while ghostty does.

Sure, it’s interesting that he managed to optimize so many things. But the claims in the picture are unproven.

[–] tun@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago

Not talking about why alacrity or kitty would not work on Linux/mac while ghostty does.

Does the picture/article claim alacritty or kitty would not work on Linux/mac? Where can I read that?