this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
744 points (92.5% liked)

Data Is Beautiful

6900 readers
1 users here now

A place to share and discuss data visualizations. #dataviz


(under new moderation as of 2024-01, please let me know if there are any changes you want to see!)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LiesSlander@beehaw.org 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"Food we eat" is half the size of "livestock feed". Plus look at how small wetlands/deserts are, wetlands especially are essential to climate resillience. What egregiously bad land use, wow. Thanks for this post, it's great.

[–] inasaba@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago

It takes 76% less land for us to just eat plants, rather than to grow them to feed to animals that we then in turn eat. Really amazing how inefficient it is.

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's just wrong though. Deserts are particularly huge in the West. Essentially the whole states of Arizona and New Mexico, plus parts of Utah and Nevada.

They're probably inside the "parks" part.

[–] PaupersSerenade@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

I think you might be on to something with the parks idea. I know California has a Protection Act on the books that covers ours.