this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
422 points (94.5% liked)

Political Memes

5383 readers
1864 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

For every problem, there is a sufficiently improbable scenario where it's a benefit.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yes, sufficiently improbable!

But the og reply I'm replying to said "correct" (not best, or appropriate, or practical), that's why I don't want a raging natural murderer doing any murdering (not even as executioner).

That's why you don't usually have hero movies where heroes heroically kill people & enjoy it - but rather heroes that oppose killing (but still kill a buch of evil™ people).

[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What definition of "correct" are you using that makes it significantly different from those others words?

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee -1 points 1 week ago

Well, since it's not exact science we are talking about the "correct" can only mean something totally subjective.

So I might not think ever the correct solution to use a murdering idiot with a gun.
Not least because that implies having (and keeping) murdering idiots.
That's one example why I would label that as an incorrect solution.