this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
457 points (77.4% liked)

Memes

45746 readers
1317 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
457
quick reminder (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by hairinmybellybutt@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You could have a personal garden, but to have a farm you'd have to obtain a lot of land. Then you'd have to make the land productive with either large and resource hungry machinery i.e. capital or you'd have to obtain and exploit the labor of farm workers to work by hand.

[–] ciko22i3@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What if i agree with some of my friends that we will join our yards to make one big field and work it together? We could also ask others for help and pay them for their work, the amount of money we both agree with.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 63 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You and your community collectively owning and operating a farm is literally a communal farm.

[–] ciko22i3@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

but if some of my friends dont want to work it they can just sell me the land. And if we produce more food than we need we can sell it so we can buy other things we don't produce. I dont understand why its wrong to own a farm.

[–] spacewitch@ttrpg.network 6 points 1 year ago

Substance farming is different than owning a farm that exists by its own production of food and selling those produced goods at market price.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Personal property is for personal use. That's it.

Once you start to accumulate surplus property then its very obviously not personal anymore. A person that doesn't want a garden won't have one to sell you, because they wouldn't have one in the first place.

Don't think in terms of "right" and "wrong". Think materially.

[–] ciko22i3@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 year ago (20 children)

what if their father left them the garden and they want to sell it to me? what if they want to move somewhere else and they decide to sell me their property?

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Inheritance is antithetical to meritocracy is the basis for generational wealth and capitalist dynasties.

Everything must go, use it lose it.

[–] ciko22i3@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What even is your motivation to do more than the bare minimum to survive if not to leave it to your children? I would rather take care of my kids future than let some corrupt government do it who will prioritize their children over mine

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (16 children)

You can't even imagine helping your neighbors, huh?

[–] MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You overestimate how much the average person cares for people they don’t know.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wish the truth was different…

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is! Humans are naturally cooperative and empathetic, we aren't selfish assholes that only care about our immediate families.

Empathy is a skill. It atrophies under capitalism, but it could be trained and flourish under different conditions.

[–] ciko22i3@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

From wikipedia:

Ancient views of greed abound in nearly every culture. In Classical Greek thought; pleonexy (an unjust desire for tangible/intangible worth attaining to others) is discussed in the works of Plato and Aristotle.[9] Pan-Hellenic disapprobation of greed is seen by the mythic punishment meted to Tantalus, from whom ever-present food and water is eternally withheld. Late-Republican and Imperial politicians and historical writers fixed blame for the demise of the Roman Republic on greed for wealth and power, from Sallust and Plutarch[10] to the Gracchi and Cicero. The Persian Empires had the three-headed Zoroastrian demon Aži Dahāka (representing unslaked desire) as a fixed part of their folklore. In the Sanskrit Dharmashastras the "root of all immorality is lobha (greed).",[11] as stated in the Laws of Manu (7:49).[12] In early China, both the Shai jan jing and the Zuo zhuan texts count the greedy Taotie among the malevolent Four Perils besetting gods and men. North American Indian tales often cast bears as proponents of greed (considered a major threat in a communal society).[13] Greed is also personified by the fox in early allegoric literature of many lands.[14][15]

Greed (as a cultural quality) was often imputed as a racial pejorative by the ancient Greeks and Romans; as such it was used against Egyptians, Punics, or other Oriental peoples;[16] and generally to any enemies or people whose customs were considered strange. By the late Middle Ages the insult was widely directed towards Jews.[17]

In the Books of Moses, the commandments of the sole deity are written in the book of Exodus (20:2-17), and again in Deuteronomy (5:6-21); two of these particularly deal directly with greed, prohibiting theft and covetousness. These commandments are moral foundations of not only Judaism, but also of Christianity, Islam, Unitarian Universalism, and the Baháʼí Faith among others. The Quran advises do not spend wastefully, indeed, the wasteful are brothers of the devils..., but it also says do not make your hand [as though] chained to your neck..."[18] The Christian Gospels quote Jesus as saying, ""Watch out! Be on your guard against all kinds of greed; a man's life does not consist in the abundance of his possessions",[19] and "For everything in the world—the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life—comes not from the Father but from the world.".[20]

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's not "human nature", that's an evolutionary eye blink! Do you think people 50,000 years ago had concepts like that? Absolutely not!

[–] ciko22i3@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes they did. Dogs are greedy. Monkeys are greedy. You dont get far in this world if you dont have some sort of greed baked into your genes.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You aren't a dog and you aren't a monkey.

Human nature is to cooperate and share among the tribe, and the tribe is basically just "anyone who lives in the same place." Yes, maybe expanding the tribe to include "everyone everywhere" is beyond human nature, but we're extremely good at welcoming new people into the tribe. There are countless examples throughout all of human history of new people being welcomed in despite being different, and that's so very different from basically the rest of the animal kingdom. Humans are amazing, stop being a misanthrope.

[–] MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

MFW we’re trying to compare a small tribe to a countries spanning landmasses…

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

So what are all those people without kids doing?

Make a better world, build a stronger economy for them excel in and make their own way. I plan on providing the very best for my children to let them go about their life as they see fit and not have to rely on something I might pass down.

Corrupt governments is a cop out statement too, ideally you wouldn't stand for government corruption.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] automaton@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Who decides what constitutes surplus?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Creyapnilla@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Keeps the means of production out of the hands of the wealthy.

[–] ciko22i3@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (11 children)

who even makes farms at that point?

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 2 points 1 year ago

What if i agree with some of my friends

Remove "some" and redefine "friends" to mean "anyone, anywhere, at anytime, and for any reason", and you're golden.