this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
700 points (99.7% liked)

Science Memes

10923 readers
2788 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 7 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

If you want a sad rabbithole, look at the cancer rates around small airports, which are often much closer to where people live.

[–] 667@lemmy.radio 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

While it’s no consolation to these current people, they are trying to make the switch to lead-free aviation fuel. It’s partly a regulatory nightmare, and partly a genuine safety challenge; mandating a fuel change in aviation without adequate research and understanding can result in unexpected engine malfunctions.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

unexpected engine malfunctions

On the other side of that is the known problems that lead causes. Seems to me that the best solution is to give everyone a cut off point, and say, hey, when we hit this point, you're going to have to retire that engine, and get one that's known to be good with lead-free avgas. Sure, it's a cost, but that's why you give people time to prepare.

[–] 667@lemmy.radio 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

They have! 2030.

I’m not sure if it’s a mandate, or a goal, but it’s there.