this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
73 points (88.4% liked)

World News

39023 readers
2363 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And now you're just lying. Just like you were lying about children choosing to be soldiers. It's no different than saying children choose to be sex workers.

It's also a war crime.

There is no such thing as a necessary war crime. There is no such thing as a forgivable war crime. Genocides have repeatedly been stopped without child soldiers being used to stop them, something I'm sure you know. Child soldiers were not necessary to end genocides in Rwanda or the Balkans.

So you can lie about me not caring about genocide all you like. It doesn't change the fact that forcibly sending children to their deaths is never necessary and always completely reprehensible. There is no moral justification for sending children to die.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I think you guys are on two different tracks.

When @Keeponstalin@lemmy.world references "the genocide", I don't think they're talking about the ongoing Israeli genocide, they're talking about the OTHER genocide, the one in Yemen, which directly involves the Houthi.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14623528.2024.2346405#abstract

It all gets muddled because the Houthis also make attacks in the Red Sea so it all kind of conflates together.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Sea_crisis

But Squid is right in that child soldiers aren't volunteers, they don't have the capacity of volunteering. They're conscripted, often on dire threats against them and their families.

The Israeli genocide really does have nothing to do with it. The Yemeni genocide definitely does.

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah I agree. I was no way defending the use of child soldiers. It's done via coercion for better access to food and water. I was trying to focus on the underlying cause, being the genocide in Yemen, as the root cause. As in the best way to end the use of child soldiers, along with all the other deaths of children in Yemen such as starvation, is to first end the genocide. Without addressing the root problem, it won't resolve, because the underlying material conditions have not changed.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago

I realize which genocide they're referring to. They're saying that child soldiers are choosing to fight against it. They're wrong.