this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
484 points (98.6% liked)

World News

39019 readers
2407 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The core of what they say is truthful, just like most propaganda. Why bother pointing it out? Why automatically doubt Ukraine, calling them very biased "at best"?

Because it's designed to undermine Ukraine and support the Kremlin and Pyong Yang.

[–] Vilian@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago

True, and Russia is always the one lying, it's their own strategy, Ukraine numbers are backed by CiA and UK intelligence right after, they actually lose support if they start lying, not Russia they only have lies, so fuck .ml

[–] pandapoo@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I can't speak to that users motivations. I can only say that initial reporting out of any warzone should be viewed skeptically. I've already provided my rationale as to why, but ultimately, it's a personal choice.

I'd rather file away first reports as unconfirmed rumors, or incomplete assessments, until I've seen additional reporting from other sources I trust.

Maybe that user really is what you said they are, or maybe they just suck at articulating the point that I was making. I don't know.

[–] 9bananas@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

bit late to the party, but:

it's not that reports out of a warzone shouldn't be questioned... it's the way the user up top chose to frame their skepticism.

it reeks of alt-right divide-and-conquer tactics...

there's plenty of people with poor articulation, but this is not that. this is on purpose.

there's a certain way the far-right tends to speak that's very distinct, once you start noticing it. and tankies, certainly not by accident, use a lot of the same language.