this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
120 points (84.9% liked)
linuxmemes
21611 readers
1424 users here now
Hint: :q!
Sister communities:
Community rules (click to expand)
1. Follow the site-wide rules
- Instance-wide TOS: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/
- Lemmy code of conduct: https://join-lemmy.org/docs/code_of_conduct.html
2. Be civil
- Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
- Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
- Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
- Bigotry will not be tolerated.
- These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
3. Post Linux-related content
- Including Unix and BSD.
- Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of
sudoin Windows. - No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
4. No recent reposts
- Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
Please report posts and comments that break these rules!
Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Anal (Ubuntu)
Because at this point, if you're still on it you're taking it up the ass from Canonical
Maybe we don't need to resort to casual homophobia though to criticize corporates
Lol, homowhat? This is ancient Rome level of insult. You're a bottom, Harry.
And Romans can't be homophobic for some reason, or what's your point?
And Romans can't be homophobic because they pretty much didn't hold the concept. Effing men and women equally was normal. Getting effed however as a man was seen as being submissive. If anything, this is more in the direction of ancient era toxic masculinity, heh.
The phrase taking it up the ass isn't homophobia, it means you're getting fucked by them and not in a good way just like everyone else.
Everyone has a butthole in which to get fucked without lube by canonical, but at least they don't wrap it in sandpaper like Apple or use a nail-ridden baseball bat like Microsoft. Arch and nix go slow and use plenty of lube, embrace gently butt stuff from your os.
So anal sex is a not-good way to have sex? Yeah sorry but that does sound pretty homophobic to me.
Ah, well that changes things. Anal without lube is a pretty universally bad experience, so sure, use that. But just framing being the receiving end of anal as bad without further context, we can do better than that, that's all im saying
Using sex terms (as in "fucked up" or "that sucks") to indicate violence (as in preventing normal action or imposing deprivation inducing results, philosophical violence, not colloquial) is a meme as old as time. It's more of a dysphemistic treadmill thing than anything. People are okay with being oppressed when talked about in normal terms like "walled garden" but talking about sex at all is taboo in a lot of places (for no good reason). (I am asexual (mostly) and I find this paradoxical aspect of the largely sexual public (in the US) to be massively a detriment to society.)
So no, using anal here isn't being homophobic. Not including it in the dysphemistic treadmill would be. My boyfriend has used this term before and he's hella gay.
Edit: for reference, I'm exaggerating a bit. Buying into a walled garden is fine if that's what you're into. Just know that you don't own the hardware or software you bought, instead you paid to get temporary access to services provided by it. For more information, see the war on right to repair.