this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024
66 points (94.6% liked)
Hackaday
297 readers
66 users here now
Fresh hacks every day
founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It wasn’t just lack of demand. It was that versus the actual cost of increased failure rates due to introducing multiple additional points of failure to every battery.
PowerCharge had significantly higher rates of self-discharge and potassium hydroxide seepage. They were more vulnerable to corrosion in suboptimal storage conditions, perhaps due to putting conductive film beneath the insulator wrapping.
In other words the proposed value-add of that product line (convenience) was also directly impacting their core brand (maximal reliability).