People Twitter

5392 readers

435 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a tweet or similar
No bullying or international politcs
Be excellent to each other.
Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

1121

The value of x (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 2 months ago by sjmarf@sh.itjust.works to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

138 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There is nothing in the image that suggests that the bottom of both triangles forms a straight line.

Except for the part where it's a single straight line segment, as depicted in the image. Showing the complimentary angles as an unlabeled approximately right angle is within convention. Showing a pair of line segments that do not form a straight line as a straight line is not.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago

Exactly.

Add to this that x is literally impossible to calculate if conventions are not assumed, and absolutely possible to calculate if conventions are followed. Assuming the conventions won't hold is an irrational position.