this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2024
2 points (75.0% liked)

Santabot

27 readers
1 users here now

Santabot is an automated moderation tool, designed to reduce moderation load and remove bad actors in a way that is transparent to all and mostly resistant to abuse and evasion.

This is a community devoted to meta discussion for the bot.

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
auk
2
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by auk to c/santabot
 

I promised to start sending spot-checks on Santa's judgements. Here they are. I'll post them as individual comments, because the formatting is more understandable that way.

NOT BANNED indicates someone who isn't banned by the algorithm, but almost.

BANNED indicates someone who is banned by the algorithm, but only just.

For each user, you'll see a snapshot of what comments they have left recently that garnered negative rank (red stripes, downvotes) or positive rank (blue stripes, upvotes). Time goes left to right, the top part of the bar shows their bad or good rank, and the bottom part of the bar links it up to the key down below, showing which posts led to what rankings. Then, down below that, there's a quote showing a representative example of why the algorithm thinks they're a problem.

My hope is that by showing where the boundary is, how obnoxious you have to be and how consistently your comments have to get downvotes in order for the algorithm to ban you, people will better understand how it works.

But who knows? Maybe I have it all wrong, and this robot moderator is ushering in a whole new robot dystopia right here on Slrpnk, and this is the evidence. Let me know what you think in the comments.

Edit: Explained the bar code more, and the purpose behind this whole thing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] auk 1 points 2 months ago

NOT BANNED

Example comment, from the post Black man found dead against tree with rope around his neck in NC: 'Not a lynching,' sheriff says:

He said Magee went to a nearby Walmart shortly before he died. That is where he is believed to have bought the rope found around his neck.

If this young man bought the rope himself, if there is evidence of this like surveillance video, that paints this situation in a pretty different light.

Edit: I want to be very clear that the police should be presenting any evidence they have of this. I would not take the police at their word. My comment here hinges on the report being true.

Ho ho ho seems we got our gold medalist right here