Conservative
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
view the rest of the comments
Nypost says that? FEMA says something different.
https://www.fema.gov/node/funding-fema-disaster-response-was-diverted-support-international-efforts-or-border-related
Your link does not contradict the claim in this post’s title or body.
Your link says that FEMA’s disaster relief money has not been reallocated.
The NYPost story linked backs up the claims in this post’s title, namely that:
More specifically, the article claims:
I’m on mobile so I don’t have the ability to easily cross reference the article and your posted link while writing this. So if I’ve made a mistake in this interpretation and reporting, please let me know.
My point though, is that the claim marked false in your direct FEMA link is not the same claim this article is making.
The article may be correct or incorrect, but its claims are not in contradiction to the claims in your link; they are simply different claims.
The overall synthesis of the two sources, (your link and the article), is that money’s been spent on migrants, no more money’s available for hurricane victims, but that FEMA’s hands are tied on this because Congress controls what FEMA spends on the two categories.
Thank you for your service. I confess I did not read the article carefully. I see it is congress that holds a fair bit of responsibility for this situation. It is interesting to note that some of those who voted against extending funding to FEMA represent states that were hard hit by Helene.
Did they vote against extending funding to FEMA for immigrant support, or did they vote against extending funding for disaster relief?
One thing this article makes clear is that funding to FEMA is not a monolith.