this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
40 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1401 readers
104 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

Last week's thread

(Semi-obligatory thanks to @dgerard for starting this)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

as seen via jwz, the tail wagging the dog continues (archive) at mozilla

"if you can't beat 'em, join 'em" but the wrong way around. I guess they got tired of begging google for money?

And, for the foreseeable future at least, advertising is a key commercial engine of the internet

this tracks analogously to something I've been saying for a while as well, but with some differences. one of the most notable is the misrepresentation here of "the internet", in the stead of "all the entities playing the online advertising game to extract from everyone else"

[–] sailor_sega_saturn@awful.systems 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Thanks I hate it.

[Advertising is] the most efficient way to ensure the majority of content remains free and accessible to as many people as possible.

Content is a scarce resource y'know. Heaven forbid the content farms go out of business; or we might end up having to read Sherlock Holmes isekai fanfiction rather than a content farm's two paragraphs and three screen-fulls of ads surrounding the tweet du jour. That would be ~~terrible~~ actually quite nice.

We know that not everyone in our community will embrace our entrance into this market. But taking on controversial topics because we believe they make the internet better for all of us is a key feature of Mozilla’s history

WTF. How is it possible for a company to be this self-congratulatory about entering the advertising space?! Someone needs to fork Firefox.

[–] gerikson@awful.systems 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

this aged like fine milk (granted it's from 2019)

It is your moral obligation to use Firefox

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 8 points 1 month ago

the predominant fork (afaik) is called LibreWolf

some indications that it is not atm entirely resilient to the upstream bullshit, but I’m curiously eyeballing whether that changes

personally, I’m hoping on servo

[–] khalid_salad@awful.systems 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This particular bit of news has me so down. :(

[–] o7___o7@awful.systems 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I guess they got tired of begging google for money?

If the stars come right, there may not be a Google to beg for money