this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
1685 points (95.6% liked)

Microblog Memes

5801 readers
3552 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The solution we're using instead of course, instead of all that environment crap you suggested, is running huge crypto farms only during the hours when the energy is in surplus.

[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

To be fair; this is a valid use case.

If you are a solar power producer; rather than offering your energy at -ve rates; run a crypto farm when the output is too high. This is far better than running the same farm on coal.

But it would be better going into something useful.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I want to pre-empt the argument from the Bitcoin people that while this is a logically sound argument for how Bitcoin mining could potentially help the environment by making renewables more economically feasible, using this argument to describe Bitcoin mining electricity usage is completely invalid—Bitcoin mining as it exists today does not merely use excess renewable energy; it consumes energy even in times of demand when it could be given to residential, commercial, or industrial customers. Without the excess demand from today's Bitcoin mines, the capacity that is freed up can be used to close fossil fuel power plants.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

To be clear, Bitcoin mining will never help the environment. There are ways to reduce it's negative effects though

[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 5 points 1 month ago

CCS would be much better than bitcoin; even though CCS is very inefficient; if the power price is effectively -ve; that means that you are only paying maintenance costs to run your CCS

[–] nlgranger@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

So if a large region (say europe, or USA + canada) is cloudy and without wind, then all transactions must stop and the remaining countries are susceptible to represent over 50% of the hashing capacity. A perfectly sound system I'm eager to see.