this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
16 points (94.4% liked)

Melbourne

1869 readers
54 users here now

This community is a place created for the people of Melbourne and Victoria. We are a positive, welcoming and inclusive community. We might not agree about everything, but we always strive to stay civil and respectful.

The focus of our discussions is based around things that effect Victoria, but we are also free to discuss our local perspective on wider issues. Or head to the regular Daily Random Discussion thread to talk about anything.

Full Community Guidelines

Ongoing discussions, FAQs & Resources (still under construction)

Adoption Certificate for Nellie, the Daily Thread numbat (with thanks to @Catfish)

Feedback & Suggestions

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RustyRaven@aussie.zone 11 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Pre-owned and pre-loved can both get in the bin. Second hand is definitely my preferred term, which I also use for pets. I really think "rescued" should only be used if you actually did more than walk in to a shelter and hand over cash.

"Thrifting" is mostly just an annoying Americanism that has no place in Australia. I will accept op-shopping as an alternative. Shopping for cheap things makes me think more Reject Shop than second-hand.

[–] TinyBreak@aussie.zone 7 points 1 month ago

gonna go home and tell me kelpie he is second hand. I like adopted, just cause I get a lot of questions about the lack of a family resemblance. Seriously, I look nothing like a working dog.

[–] StudChud@aussie.zone 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I didn't rescue my cat or my old dog; they were rescued by other people. I just adopted them.

I mean, I don't mind the term "rescue cat" but I'd avoid it personally, as I had no hand in their rescue.

I don't like the term "bought" when referring to a pet adoption, as I feel that it is too close to possession and property (and while that is the case when it comes to the law, from a personal view animals are sentient and "buying" them I feel reduces their autonomy - again just personal preference, I don't care if other people say they bought their pet). My pets have all been integrals parts of my family units, and therefore I prefer "adoption".

[–] melbaboutown@aussie.zone 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Adopted… kidnapped… shanghaied… joined the crew… enlisted… became a ward/charge… got distributed (ie. Cat Distribution System )… live in companion working for board 😂

[–] Seagoon_@aussie.zone 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Legally it's ownership and pets are possessions. It's a difficult thing to regulate, how do we recognise human and animal relationships and how do we make humans responsible for their care and well being.

Maybe guardianship is a better way to think of it.

I disagree with the word adoption, animals are not humans and it's dangerous to equate animals with humans as they have different needs.

I agree on the metaphysical aspect, animals own their own lives.

[–] RustyRaven@aussie.zone 5 points 1 month ago

I tend to refer to my pets as staff. And as a good employer I have a duty of care, including a safe workplace and conditions.

But then I refer to inanimate objects as staff too, so I'm probably just weird 🤣

[–] Seagoon_@aussie.zone 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Totes agree on the rescue pets. Both my guys were rescued by other people, Bill rescued from the streets and Ted from a neglectful cat farm, and then I bought them.

I like op-shopping. I think thrifting was coined because Americans are very class and money conscious. Here op shops are traditionally about supporting your community and there is no shame in that.

[–] dumblederp@aussie.zone 5 points 1 month ago

I was definitely bullied for my op-shop clothes at Brighton Beach Primary School. East Bentleigh tech was more relaxed.

[–] RustyRaven@aussie.zone 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think there used to be shame in going to op shops, but it has become much more acceptable now. Definitely when I was a kid it was something used to tease other people about, as it was seen as a mark of poverty.

Mr Woof came from the streets, but I'm not sure if he'd see it as a rescue or as being kidnapped while he was out looking for ladies.

[–] Force_majeure123@aussie.zone 5 points 1 month ago

Next minute...

[–] melbaboutown@aussie.zone 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Out of curiosity, is it a rescue if you look after the pets while the owner is in hospital and then adopt them directly when the old owner enters palliative care? Then sort out a lot of vet care?

It doesn’t matter but I’ve always wondered how to answer in a short way how I got Melbcat.

Technically I still adopted her. Rescue to me always sounded like literally rescuing a pet from a storm drain or dog fights and rehabilitating them

[–] RustyRaven@aussie.zone 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'd still probably go with re-homed for that. Rescue to me definitely implies doing a bit more.

I know someone who drove to a dodgy area to collect a dog which was being starved in a backyard because it's owner was in prison, and I'd definitely say by doing that she rescued the dog. Other times the pet may have been rescued, like a chicken that was retrieved from a tree in Chinatown by the fire brigade. In which case it is reasonable to refer to them as a rescue chicken, but that doesn't mean the person who then gives them a home should get credit for the rescue, they have still just re-housed a rescued animal.

[–] melbaboutown@aussie.zone 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, rescue implies some pretty exceptional circumstances

[–] Seagoon_@aussie.zone 3 points 1 month ago

maybe it's middle class people rescuing a pet from a working class area /family/existence s/