this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
421 points (98.8% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6653 readers
1355 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 39 points 1 month ago (4 children)

This is what you get, when you put the army in charge of a carrier, instead of the boat people.

[–] SuspiciousCatThing@pawb.social 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, give it to the Coat Guard where it belongs.

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Littoral carrier groups when? Blue water is dead. Long live the shallows!

[–] CptEnder@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Basically the entire plot to the ExFor series. Buck Army Colonel finds himself in command of an alien starship somehow. The series is one extremely non credible event after another and aware of itself.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This plot point sounds vaguely Macross/Robotech derived, and I love that. I might have to check that out.

[–] CptEnder@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you like cheesy military sci-fi that makes fun of itself, blended with pretty unique wargame and battle concepts you'll love it. The audiobooks are a must, RC Bray is brilliant.

[–] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Amen, fellow monkey.

[–] NewAgeOldPerson@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why do you want the army in charge of the boat people?

[–] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Hardie,har har.

That's actually pretty good.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 6 points 1 month ago

Napoleon: The navy is just an army on boats

Cao Cao: agreed, how hard can it be?