Conservative
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
view the rest of the comments
Its racist against the indigenous people of Britain.
How?
How is it not?
That's not how the burden of proof works. You made the claim that it was racist. You have the burden to prove that it is racist. I have no burden to prove it isn't.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(philosophy)
You can't just shift the burden of proof onto me, it is a fallacy:
https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Shifting-of-the-Burden-of-Proof
Racism: prejudice against a race.
This is prejudiced against the anglo saxons.
How is it not racist?
How is it prejudiced? All you've done is traded the word you're using.
It says that no matter where white people live, they are colonists, even if they are the natives.