this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
90 points (95.0% liked)

Wikipedia

1422 readers
268 users here now

A place to share interesting articles from Wikipedia.

Rules:

Recommended:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AEsheron@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

I mean, it ran until 2019 when it was shut down because it wasn't profitable. That's a pretty good track record.

[–] andyburke@fedia.io 4 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Peak AI shit where they think reopening an unprofitable nuke plant is gonna help AI somehow be profitable.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

In particular, that they signed a 20-year-long deal. I'm guessing that gets them lower prices, and it is Microsoft, so I would expect them to weasel out of that contract somehow. But still just wild to me that they would even consider such a long-running contract for technology that's been around for barely a fraction of that.

[–] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Even if the AI bubble pops spectacularly and Microsoft aren't training any new models in two years, Microsoft still have massive datacentres that need to compute loads of things, and loads of things they'd like to compute, but don't because they don't have the capacity, but might end up doing if they're suddenly not training AI models on lots of machines. Having free electricity for twenty years is useful for a tech company with or without AI, and nuclear is a good way to get back on track for being carbon neutral soonish like they were going to be before all the recent AI stuff.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)