this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
641 points (97.2% liked)

World News

38970 readers
2503 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Russian President Vladimir Putin has suffered an emabarassing setback as his feared Satan 2 nuclear arsenal failed four out of five missile tests, according to arms experts and satellite imagery from the launch site.

High-resolution satellite images of the launch pad at Russia's Plesetsk test site, where the RS-28 Sarmat intercontinental ballistic missile exploded, shows extensive damage.

A crater approximately 60 meters wide at the launch silo at the Plesetsk Cosmodrome in northern Russia, along with visible damage in the surrounding area that was not present in images taken earlier in the month.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chellomere@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Not so sure. What if these 4/5 nukes explode on the launch pad? Even if this is in a remote area you'll cause some damage to your own country.

[–] AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Based on the little bit I know about both Russian military history and the stuff they do now, I suspect they'd be okay with that.

[–] Vilian@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

They aren't even shooting Ukraine nuclear plants afraid of retaliation from NATO, nuclear is even worse

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Most nukes are designed such that they only create a nuclear blast when detonated electronically.

We've had nukes fall out of airplanes and explode, or nuclear-tipped missiles explode in the silo, without a nuclear blast.

[–] Anarch157a@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

All of those happened before the modern safeguards were adopted by the US. We're lucky none of them went super-critical. We just don't know for sure if the Soviet leftovers Russia has were upgraded to the same atandards.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 month ago

All of those happened before the modern safeguards were adopted by the US.

Which modern safeguards are you talking about? There's been ~32 official broken arrow incidents between 1950 and 1980, and multiple safeguards were tried during that period. Modern 2 point detonation safety goes back to the early 60s

We just don’t know for sure if the Soviet leftovers Russia has were upgraded to the same atandards.

We do know the soviets had their own share of accidents. I wasn't able to find any info on soviet nuclear weapon design safety mechanisms, but I feel like we'd have seen at least one nuclear blast if they didn't have them.