this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2024
194 points (97.5% liked)

United States | News & Politics

1868 readers
284 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] match@pawb.social 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

maybe we can agree to bisect both parties at once

[–] ravhall@discuss.online 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Ooo, four parties? I like that. BUT they all get new names and no one is auto-registered.

Name suggestions:

  • Conservative Traditionalist (god)
  • Libertarian (me, me, me)
  • Progressive (us)
  • Centrist (the rich)
[–] SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Easier. Let's just do political parties by financial status. But swaps representations to be proportionate to populace of each status.

70% representatives poor party 29.9% middle class 0.1% unobtainable dragon hording wealth.

[–] ravhall@discuss.online 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

We could always ban all political donations and ban superpacs. Money != politics

Lobbyists go to jail.

[–] SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yea I think that boulder would be easier to push than the mountain I just suggested lol