this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
449 points (98.7% liked)

People Twitter

5236 readers
2103 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sus@programming.dev 78 points 2 months ago (4 children)
[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 33 points 2 months ago

See, that's an actual thought provoking piece on the nature of human perception so you can argue it's an actual work of art.

[–] ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I’ve commented about this before, but I do actually miss those first few generations of image generators. The first DeepDream style stuff was interesting but didn’t go very far, but this image in particular is a milestone for what came directly after.

I would love to run VQGAN+CLIP locally, for example, in some efficient way. It was fun to play with and to see how the model interpreted the input. And it wasn’t as scary as the tools we have now (especially when those are paired with the deep fake face swap stuff, for example)

I genuinely think slop is the perfect word for the current iteration of these image generators, both the image outputs themselves and the role they’re playing in the already-bleak digital media landscape.

[–] tweeks@feddit.nl 6 points 2 months ago

This is the first time I realize that this famous image was not "designed" to simulate what a stroke feels like visually, it was just serendipity. They were probably just really trying to generate an image of a living room, but the AI image generators were still in its infancy.

[–] peteypete420@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Shlitzburg. That wasn't hard.

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

This is only the first round.