this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
1220 points (97.4% liked)

Microblog Memes

5787 readers
3034 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

What? The bands already have a range, they don’t stay static on a single frequency in that band because of overloading, but if it needs to be done for periods of a time, there’s no issue with that. The band already cycles, what regulatory “machines” are involved? Stay at the top end, and then the bottom end for a bit. Put the cycle on a schedule instead of having all active at once.

And no they wouldn’t lose internet, there’s multiple bands and frequencies for that exact reason. If ones congested, it shifts to another less congested and cycles that way.

Using the light and laser example shift the red light to oranger and get some data, shift it to bluer and get the other. You can also shift the laser a little to get get more data on either side of that.

Light, like radio has fluctuations you can take advantage of to read between the lines.

[–] UFO64@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Read the comment more carefully stranger.

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

? What…?

I rebuttal your comment and ask for additional information and you just say read it again?

Maybe you need to read the chain again, because you claim there’s a regulatory machine. Can you expand on how this is relevant? I spent time clarifying f my position and this is the shit I get back for a discussion…?

[–] UFO64@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Correct. You need to read it again.

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes and you need to read my comment again since I explained how there isn’t a regulatory body since they already shift…

You aren’t the sharpest crayon are you?

[–] UFO64@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Your sad attempt at an ad hominem rather proves my point.