this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
1220 points (97.4% liked)

Microblog Memes

5787 readers
2809 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

A couple of satellites can make a larger telescope than we could ever build on earth, and you avoid the natural interference as well as the the interference from other satellites (star link isn’t the only source of interference…).

[–] BlushedPotatoPlayers@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes, and we are already doing that, VLBI uses dozens of telescopes, each of them larger that we could sensibly launch to space

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The vlbi has dozens of 20m dishes, they have satellites with 10m diameters and Orion is thought to have 100m diameter. We’ve launched larger into space already, and the VLBI has used space telescopes to increase its size already as well.

So to claim we can’t sensibly launch any, when we have them up there already is plain wrong.

[–] BlushedPotatoPlayers@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 month ago

Yes, I just wrote about that above. It's just the difference in cost between the two. How many large space observatories were there altogether? In the order of dozens maybe?