this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
1220 points (97.4% liked)

Microblog Memes

5787 readers
3363 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The best solution is probably to not have starlink satellites up in space tbh

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Any satellite would provide interference, and the earth naturally has its own, so that’s a non-factor, when the best results can only be had in space.

Radio astronomy isn’t exactly a home hobbies thing if you didn’t know….

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And radio telescopes aren't exactly compact enough to build in space. Radio telescope arrays tend to be fields withs dozens-hundreds of dishes several meters across.

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago

You can do the same in space…

[–] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There is also the fact that the starlink satellites are depleting the ozone layer, in case you haven't decided we should remove these things yet.

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago

And? What’s that got to do with radio interfernce?