this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
869 points (89.7% liked)

Microblog Memes

5402 readers
3046 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] citrusface@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You're wrong, but chromium uses a fork of webkit

[–] citrusface@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

welp, thats that. oh well. i can be wrong - all good.

it doesnt matter really because i cant develop a browser and i have to use what exists - i choose duckduckchrome.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It does matter, because Firefox exists, and you're free to choose that one too. If you know about the underlying tech your decision is more informed.

[–] citrusface@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

im not going to pretend im smart enough to understand the backend difference between safari/chrome/firefox - firefox mobile hasnt been a great experience for me, but i dont use the browser on my phone all that much. at home, its vivalidi because it works well. im not knocking firefox, its been my go to browser for over a decade - but its been seemingly backed by google this whole time? i dont know.

[–] Crismus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Google paying Mozilla for search placement is the same as Google paying Samsung and Apple for search priority on their phones.

It doesn't mean that Google is backing Mozilla, Apple, and Samsung.

Mozilla has to take a much smaller cut compared to Apple because of their size, nothing else.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you're on iPhone there is no difference in the tech under the hood, because apple only allows webkit. Anything besides Safari is essentially Safari with a skin. The difference in tech is rarely the issue though. It's the monopolistic practices of Google and apple that should concern us

[–] citrusface@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

100% agree and what I was trying to get to - it's the tech monopolies that are the issue here.

And I'm on pixel6a - so it's Google anyway.