People Twitter

5173 readers

2196 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a tweet or similar
No bullying or international politcs
Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

468

Scientific American (feddit.org)

submitted 1 month ago by 101@feddit.org to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Mastodon Toot.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] greenshirtdenimjeans@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Only the 2nd time is surprising considering the right doesn’t believe in science

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They used to just look sideways at it instead of straight up denial.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's a wonder each of them was the respectively "fittest" sperm. I mean, fuck. I'm curious if even Darwin understood how much raw chance was involved in this "evolution" he imagined. 🤡

[–] itsworkthatwedo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ha, raw.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

That's the problem, yes. Wrap that thing, FFS.

[–] trk@aussie.zone 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's not the first sperm that fertilises an egg... The first who make it put in all the effort breaching the wall and dying of exhaustion before some lazy piece of shit sperm towards the end just waltzes through the hole and does the needful.

Explains a lot tbh

[–] Eiri@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is that a relatively recent phenomenon or has it been that way for decades?

If it's the former, it might explain why they didn't need to before.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Tea Party(2010s or so) is when they started going anti-science. They've always been pro Christian though, so it's a fuzzy line.