this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2024
560 points (79.4% liked)

Memes

45575 readers
1799 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CazzoneArrapante@lemm.ee -3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Nah, it is. Seize all their assets and if they complain, again, some Pinochet-style methods that will bend them to our knees.

Sorry, patience is over and right-wingers and their financiers must be dealt with the appropriate way.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] CazzoneArrapante@lemm.ee -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sorry, tired of world going to shit and if we need someone that makes Stalin look like a kitten to fix it, so be it.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That will not fix it. You're advocating for adventurism, not leftism.

[–] CazzoneArrapante@lemm.ee -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

adventurism

Adventurist leftism, maybe?

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

Whatever that poster planned to implement their beliefs would probably devolve into adventurism but, taken at face value, I think it would be much more accurate to call their proposal blanquist.

[–] araneae@beehaw.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] CazzoneArrapante@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This is what I would do if I were in power.

[–] araneae@beehaw.org 2 points 1 month ago

P R A X I S

R

A

X

I

S

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'd do it differently.

I would fund a massive advertising campaign preaching equality, fairness, and cooperation

I would use the tax system to weaken the cycle of intergenerational wealth (the ultra wealthy spend borrowed money which is settled by their estate on death; I would tax bequests to banks; I would tax inheritances above a pretty high limit.

It would take time. The aim would be to have a much more level wealth distribution

[–] CazzoneArrapante@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

Nah, fuck that. Dictatorship, right-wingers get treated Pinochet-style (eye for an eye) and if rich lobbyists try to make a mess, take their families as hostages. Fuck good manners.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Seize who's assets exactly? The second you draw a line and say anyone on the other side has fewer rights than you, you're falling right in line with those same right-wing policies.

There is no way to define a law against "right-wingers" that doesn't infringe on basic rights like freedom of opinion and freedom from discrimination. You can't punish people for being part of a group. You need to point to something specific that each individual has done that is illegal before prosecuting. Anything less and society will break down into fascism.

[–] CazzoneArrapante@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago

Seize who’s assets exactly?

Rich people's

The second you draw a line and say anyone on the other side has fewer rights than you

Nah, just do it against rich people.

There is no way to define a law against “right-wingers” that doesn’t infringe on basic rights like freedom of opinion and freedom from discrimination. You can’t punish people for being part of a group. You need to point to something specific that each individual has done that is illegal before prosecuting. Anything less and society will break down into fascism.

Fuck this fake democracy then.