this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2024
36 points (90.9% liked)

Network Neutrality and Digital Inclusion

54 readers
8 users here now

This community is broadly about network neutrality. It’s important to note a major component of #netneutrality is access equality and thus #digitalInclusion.

Related communities:

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 

When Google sabotages network neutrality by blocking Tor and Invidious instances, is it wise for the fedi to facilitate the sharing of #Youtube links?

Fedi instance operators would probably not tolerate links into Facebook’s walled-garden if people were to start polluting an otherwise open community with them. So Youtube links should probably be treated with contempt during periods where Google’s DoS attack is underway.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Google and youtube are shitty companies.

But I dont understand how blocking external clients would infringe on net neutrality?

[–] GetOffMyLan@programming.dev 11 points 4 days ago

It's not. Net neutrality is about treating all network packets equally during transmission. Like mobile data operators giving free social media.

Server owners blocking traffic from certain IPs is not that at all.

[–] DarkNightoftheSoul@mander.xyz 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I would argue that google's size, position, and status as something approaching monopoly for the service of routing internet traffic assigns it to a position somewhere among the order of ISPs. In fact, now I consider it, it very much is an ISP in the original sense, too: google fiber is a thing (or maybe was- did they kill that, too?). On that basis, its blocking invidious and tor are very much in violation of the spirit and the letter of net neutrality. Then again, they killed the law, so.