this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2024
747 points (98.8% liked)
Comic Strips
12478 readers
3916 users here now
Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.
The rules are simple:
- The post can be a single image, an image gallery, or a link to a specific comic hosted on another site (the author's website, for instance).
- The comic must be a complete story.
- If it is an external link, it must be to a specific story, not to the root of the site.
- You may post comics from others or your own.
- If you are posting a comic of your own, a maximum of one per week is allowed (I know, your comics are great, but this rule helps avoid spam).
- The comic can be in any language, but if it's not in English, OP must include an English translation in the post's 'body' field (note: you don't need to select a specific language when posting a comic).
- Politeness.
- Adult content is not allowed. This community aims to be fun for people of all ages.
Web of links
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world: "I use Arch btw"
- !memes@lemmy.world: memes (you don't say!)
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
dubiously
Worse than Batman & Robin?
I mean, yes, everyone's got different preferences and all, but...
Was that the one, where Batman's suit had nipples?
I think that's Batman Forever. Batman & Robin is the one with Arnold Schwarzenegger as a very punny Mr. Freeze.
It's arguably one of the best movies ever made.
That spoiler tag doesn't work (on the web version of Lemmy at least) but good effort
Well then it can't be the worst... Hmm we will have to do some digging for worst Batman movie but let's start by accepting bat nipples and giant bombs that say "boom!" on them automatically elevate the movies.
That's the one.
Batman & Robin, though terrible, at least looked nice. Good colour palette and cinematography. Good set design and special effects. Decent acting all round. It's clearly harking back to technicolour Batman. It was schlock but that was clear from the outset. There was no hope of it ever being anything but a movie to kill an hour and a half. I'd watch it with my 8 year old gladly.
This travesty was made by one of the (supposed) best directors of his age (not evidenced by his largely awful movies, which are pompous style over substance) but it was a mess from start to finish. Poor casting, poor dialogue apparently written by a 12 year old, numerous ridiculous plot points. Batman was barely in the movie, apart from the lengthy and ridiculous broken back scenes. It was basically a movie about Joseph Gordon Levitt's character.
It was the stark opposite of the classic that preceded it.
The Rifftrax of it is really, REALLY good, though.
Right up there with their Street Fighter The Movie.