this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
515 points (98.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7124 readers
980 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ChrisHani@lemmy.ml 146 points 1 year ago (20 children)

It was beneficial.

To white property owners. Much to the detriment of enslaved Africans and their descendants.

[–] sadreality@kbin.social 28 points 1 year ago (16 children)

Property? That's a bit broad...

It was beneficial to slave owners, specifically.

And their families should be paying reparations for the ill gotten gains.

[–] ChrisHani@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

WHITE slave owners.

You seem to be avoiding a certain adjective.

[–] gaylord_fartmaster@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Slavery benefitted both white and non-white slave owners.

Edit: at least in the short-term, obviously you could argue differently for long-term effects.

[–] SirElliott@beehaw.org 15 points 1 year ago

This is an incomplete view of the history of slavery. By the numbers, the vast majority of the people benefitting from chattel slavery were white. However, slave ownership reached similar per capita rates among some of the Native American tribes, and there were instances of slaves being owned by free people of color. Notably, there are a large number of black tribal members in the United States. The United States government signed a number of treaties with the tribes in the 1860s that required them to free their slaves and incorporate them as full tribal members.

None of this is said to diminish the fact that the American system of slavery was a product of colonization by European countries. But it is rather reductive to claim that only white property owners benefitted from the atrocity that was chattel slavery.

[–] sadreality@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While vast majority were "white"... There were others who owned slaves.

All of their families should be held accountable and their profits and wealth should be dislodged to pay reperations to the decedants.

Allowing successors to keep these gains is a crime in of itself.

[–] trias10@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How could you even track accounting profits that far back in time to repay today? What if the family descendants are poor today? (They lost everything in the Great Depression, as an example)

[–] sadreality@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Funny thing about money is that it is all traceable. I am not going to act like it is easy but it is not impossible

Sure if money is gone, you can't get blood from a stone... But many families who made money are still ruling us.

Same thing in Germany with families who profited from slave labor during Nazi regimes...

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)