United States | News & Politics

Most property owners ie had a plot of land could not afford a slave... they worked that land themselves and then forced their 6 kids do it for them.

I've become partial to a language change to enslaved people and slavers. It emphasizes the humanity of the victims of slavery and refuses to acknowledge the view of human beings as property. Instead enslavement is a property foisted upon the victims and enslavement is an evil perpetrated by slavers.

Cell phone and a car are also property... So is a house...

Not all property owners were slavers.

Slavery benefitted both white and non-white slave owners.

Edit: at least in the short-term, obviously you could argue differently for long-term effects.

This is an incomplete view of the history of slavery. By the numbers, the vast majority of the people benefitting from chattel slavery were white. However, slave ownership reached similar per capita rates among some of the Native American tribes, and there were instances of slaves being owned by free people of color. Notably, there are a large number of black tribal members in the United States. The United States government signed a number of treaties with the tribes in the 1860s that required them to free their slaves and incorporate them as full tribal members.

None of this is said to diminish the fact that the American system of slavery was a product of colonization by European countries. But it is rather reductive to claim that only white property owners benefitted from the atrocity that was chattel slavery.

While vast majority were "white"... There were others who owned slaves.

All of their families should be held accountable and their profits and wealth should be dislodged to pay reperations to the decedants.

Allowing successors to keep these gains is a crime in of itself.