this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2024
46 points (81.1% liked)

memes

9667 readers
3311 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hey guys, it was brought up in a report that NSFW tags should be applied to posts depicting drug use. What do you guys think? I could see it either way and thought you guys might like to weigh in on it. I personally don't find it particularly offensive but my work environments have never been the type to react strongly to something like this popping up on screen (I think they might be more upset about being on Lemmy at all). Currently there is no rule, and I am fine with that, unless feedback indicates the community would rather play it safe and require the NSFW flag.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If you do drugs I would say that alcohol must be too, why one and not the other?

[–] Oisteink@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Just censor everything- it’s the internet after all and someone will be offended

[–] aaaa@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

An NSFW tag isn't censorship, it's a warning for people at WORK. if you don't use it for what it's for, that's not working people problems, that's your fault.

[–] Oisteink@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yeah. Or that was the original meaning like 15 years back. Now there are hide nsfw settings in most clients and some of them where thats the default

[–] aaaa@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Which you can easily turn off if you don't browse Lemmy at work.

Just because you don't use the tag for its intended purpose doesn't mean everyone doesn't. The tag has a clear purpose, denoted by what it stands for. Most people with adult jobs understand its purpose. Don't ruin the tag's purpose for the rest of us by devaluing it

[–] Oisteink@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That tag covers a lot of different things. This has been debated on reddit for 15 years, with no progress on other types of tags. It’s the only one, so while it says “work” it includes stuff a lot of us don’t need/want in general. It’s there to censor stuff

[–] aaaa@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It isn't censorship if you can just turn it off and see everything. It's a warning for people who want to browse at work but not view content that can get them in trouble

Just turn it off and ignore it if it doesn't apply to you. The rest of us want the tag to be used for its purpose.

[–] Oisteink@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You base this on some sort of research into usage of nsfw tagging or just pull shit out of your ass?

[–] aaaa@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Yes, my experience with websites over the past few decades.

NSFW stands for "not safe for work." What do you think it means? It's pretty straightforward in its meaning.

[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You probably shouldn't doom scroll at work anyway.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This. I don't know why people have such a hard time with the idea of sticking to curated spaces when they are at work or in public.

[–] aaaa@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The NSFW tag is part of the mechanism to curate the feed.

I'm not sure why people get offended by people wanting to use social media but not wanting to view content that can get them fired. If the content doesn't bother you, then you shouldn't filter NSFW content. It's not like the NSFW tag is censoring the content and preventing you from seeing it if you click it.

For people with jobs, why not make it easier to filter the things that companies don't like? It doesn't affect you any.

[–] Oisteink@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Unless you work as a doom scroller. But even then it can be dangerous and offending. Censor that too

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Drugs in general is an overreach, but personally I think someone actively using a needle should be flagged. Regardless of what the needle is used for.

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Public advertisements depict people getting vaccines and other shots. Thats a weird stance, when you could view that anywhere accidentally, not even online.

Newspapers, news channels, etc, all depict pictures and videos of people getting vaccines.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why are you following me around?

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

What? These comments are all in the same post, I could ask you the exact same thing in few comments in this post lmfao.

This is even in a chain you responded to me first? The fuck…?