this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2024
543 points (98.9% liked)

Not The Onion

11845 readers
372 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] warbond@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Commenters are getting this backwards. If there was a round in the chamber it would be the last to go off, not the first. Whereas the rest of the rounds are directly exposed to the heat, the chambered round has a thick metal barrel around it protecting it from that heat.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

i'd think it probably depends. the barrel itself is quite large and transmits heat pretty well, given that if it didn't shit would melt.

compared to rounds in the magazine which are more closely exposed, but through plastic, or air, which doesn't transmit heat quite as effectively.

i guess we should probably put a gun in an oven and see what happens hm?

[–] warbond@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

While the oven is preheating, allow me to postulate that the thermal mass of the barrel, especially in vicinity of the breech, would require far more exposure to heat to reach the temperature required for the powder to spontaneously ignite.

This is why hot gun cook-offs occur, because the barrel has absorbed enough heat that it's able to ignite the powder through the casing via conduction. As such, as you would expect, after containing a single explosion (i.e. firing a round), the chamber would be warm to the touch while the exterior of the barrel would remain cool. It's not until the metal is exposed to enough heat internally that the barrel becomes too hot to touch externally.

So that's my logic here. If it was suddenly 500 degrees outside, I think the safest place to hide a bullet in a gun to keep it from exploding is the chamber.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

yeah, that's a possibility, but maybe if it's a really slow preheat, or over a long enough time period, it might be possible.

Although you might expect the magazine to also cook off, but if you have a round chambered in the barrel, it might be an inevitability at that point so.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Or if the gun barrel is in direct contact with the element (as in "hid" on the bottom of the stove).

that would be a fun setup, self disabling LMAO