this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
1085 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

58072 readers
4612 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The songs that the AI CEO provided to Smith originally had file names full of randomized numbers and letters such as "n_7a2b2d74-1621-4385-895d-b1e4af78d860.mp3," the DOJ noted in its detailed press release.

When uploading them to streaming platforms, including Amazon Music, Apple Music, Spotify, and YouTube Music, the man would then change the songs' names to words like "Zygotes," "Zygotic," and "Zyme Bedewing," whatever that is.

The artist naming convention also followed a somewhat similar pattern, with names ranging from the normal-sounding "Calvin Mann" to head-scratchers like "Calorie Event," "Calms Scorching," and "Calypso Xored."

To manufacture streams for these fake songs, Smith allegedly used bots that stream the songs billions of times without any real person listening. As with similar schemes, the bots' meaningless streams were ultimately converted to royalty paychecks for the people behind them.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] shani66@ani.social 57 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (14 children)

Lawsuit, sure, but is it actually illegal?

[–] FahrenheitGhost@lemmy.world 57 points 1 week ago (5 children)

People who are not part of the wealthy elite stealing profits is illegal. Doesn't matter what the method was.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 21 points 1 week ago (3 children)

And yet Xitter, Farcebook and similar platforms still publish their stats as if all their users are real human beings. So why isn't that fraud?

[–] shuzuko@midwest.social 22 points 1 week ago

Because it's only fraud if a normal person makes money from it, duh 🤪

[–] dabster291@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

People who are ~~not~~ part of the wealthy elite stealing profits is ~~il~~legal.

[–] Summzashi@lemmy.one 3 points 1 week ago

Plausible deniability is the answer.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)