Privacy

31872 readers

267 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

[Matrix/Element]Dead
Discord

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Can someone compare PGP (delta chat) with Telegram privacy? (lemm.ee)

submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by Kualk@lemm.ee to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

20 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I don’t want to see PGP rejection based on usability. So, to level the field at user level we take Delta Chat, which uses PGP. If I understand that correctly.

I have no knowledge of telegram security at all.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Agreed.

No audit...then we don't know.

Have you seen an audit for SwissCows' Teleguard?

I've been testing it for a few days now, after a comment about it here.

They claim to not store your chats, they're deleted after delivery. To sync a new device requires an encrypted backup from an existing device.

I've tested this by restoring a backup from yesterday to sync a new device, and it only has data from yesterday.

That said, I really don't know how trustworthy they are.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 months ago

Nice, I hadn't heard of them until now, either.

I'm just excited that end-to-end-encrypted services have become in such high demand that we're seeing lots of different implementations.

It took a while, but it looks like Veilid finally has a basic chat built in their protocol as well. It says it's secure, but I can't find any info on its particulars.

https://gitlab.com/veilid/veilidchat

[+] Upstream7564@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

[deleted]

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Meh. I only read a translated version, so it's hard to tell nuance.

But nothing in there is inaccurate. Maybe overstated.

Personally Signal seems trustworthy, but... I have some ambivalence, given their bullshit reasons for dropping SMS support. They claimed it cost them engineering, which is at best wrong, at worst a flat out lie. Signal has nothing to do with how SMS is managed - it merely hands the message to Android's SMS system. It's trivial. So why would they drop support and use that lie?

When I'm being misled, I start to look at everything else as having a bit more validity.

Plus UI/UX on signal sucks. It's no better than the lamest SMS app. Hell, old SMS apps are better. And no multi-device sync. They claim it can't be done and maintain encryption. Right. Clients just need to use the same encryption key...like Telegram does, and now Teleguard - and they're claiming full e2e at all times.