this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2024
589 points (93.6% liked)

Political Memes

5404 readers
3812 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
HLMenckenFan@lemmy.world
Rooki@lemmy.world
automodbeta@lemmy.world
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
rjc@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
JonsJava@lemmy.world
WrenFeathers@lemmy.world
589
Stance on conflict (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 months ago by trek32@lemmy.world to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world
227 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Don't think so either. Seems the US State is dedicated to genocide and it is disrespectful to pretend otherwise.

[–] No_Money_Just_Change@feddit.org 6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

The best chance now, in my opinion, is to vote what is by far the lesser evil and than get active to either improve the parties or create a voting system that allows more than two to have realistic chances

[–] Fidel_Cashflow@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

In their moral justification, the argument of the lesser evil has played a prominent role. If you are confronted with two evils, the argument runs, it is your duty to opt for the lesser one, whereas it is irresponsible to refuse to choose altogether. Its weakness has always been that those who choose the lesser evil forget quickly that they chose evil.

-Hannah Arendt, from "Personal Responsibility under Dictatorship", 1964

[–] Rookwood@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Unless you're organizing a revolution before November, you better vote against the fascists.

[–] Fidel_Cashflow@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago

I will not vote for candidates sending arms and aid to genocidal apartheid ethnostates. if the PSL is on the ballot in my state I will vote for them, otherwise it'll probably be Stein 👍

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Tankies quoting Hannah Arendt when she specifies that she's speaking specifically about totalitarian societies, and not even dictatorships; much less actual functioning democracies. Average tankie reading comprehension. Or, in Hannah Arendt's words from the same essay...

Those who denounce the moral fallacy of this argument are usually accused of a germ-proof moralism which is alien to political circumstances, of being unwilling to dirty their hands; and it must be admitted that it is not so much political or moral philosophy (with the sole exception of Kant, who for this very reason frequently stands accused of moralistic rigorism) but religious thought that most unequivocally has rejected all compromises with lesser evils.

You keep the fascist dogma up, buddy. It'll save your soul someday. :)

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

get active to either improve the parties or create a voting system that allows more than two to have realistic chances

What does this entail? You can't vibe parties into changing policy, they only concede what they have to. Supporting Israel benefits the US economically, as its the equivalent of an aircraft carrier on land. It cements the Petro-Dollar as the global standard, which allows the US to make tons of money. Therefore, no matter what, the DNC and GOP will support genocide.