this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
1893 points (100.0% liked)

196

16416 readers
1896 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
1893
Android rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by CosmicFlowchart@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gerbler@lemmy.world 143 points 1 year ago (15 children)

Android's file structure is so incomprehensible. I'm genuinely surprised there hasn't been any significant effort made to make it more readable. Pictures saved in app directories, downloads, camera, images, pictures, media, DCIM???.

[–] Metallibus@lemmy.world 100 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm genuinely surprised there hasn't been any significant effort made to make it more readable.

Quite the opposite. They've tried to make it better, and in turn, they've made it worse.

They used to have a pretty straightforward Linux file structure, and you were expected to put things in the external Pictures folder. And downloads went to the external Downloads folder. Back then, internal storage was small and SDs were large, so apps couldn't really afford to store these things locally and the SD structure was well enough defined that it was pretty clear where pictures would go.

Now, Google has pushed against SD cards. They also started requiring more permissions for external storage. They've added some "documents" APIs that were supposed to make it easier to tag/find files, but it's a tangled mess and most apps don't touch it. And they've rewritten their storage model multiple times at this point. If you're writing a new app, it's unclear which model to even follow anymore because Google has created a giant cluster fuck of options and paradigms.

Google is actively making this problem worse and worse. I wish they had never tried to "fix" this in the first place.

[–] outdated_belated@lemmy.sdf.org 44 points 1 year ago (1 children)

xkcd “standards” comes to mind

[–] MinusPi@pawb.social 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We don't even have to link the relevant xkcds anymore

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

there was that joke where every joke is already known so instead of telling the joke they just say the number of it.

wonder if we ever get there, someone will just reply, xkcd 375

load more comments (13 replies)