this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2024
1673 points (98.6% liked)

Political Memes

5415 readers
3277 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I don't know how any of this works, but I assume some person who "has been harmed" by the actions needs to press charges. I would assume that could potentially be any American. Wouldn't it be great if Harris did it? The former prosecutor/DA filing charges against the criminal opponent.

[–] Hawk@lemmynsfw.com 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

In most common law jurisdictions, the executive branch doesn't require even a victim, they merely need the elements of the criminal offence satisfied.

Not sure about the US, likely they need her to strengthen the case and won't bother without her witness testimony.

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

I don't think that's right. In cases where the person pressing charges makes the difference between filing suit or not, it's like because their testimony is crucial to the case. The government doesn't need it, though.