this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2024
726 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

58133 readers
5189 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 67 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (59 children)

Deleted comment:

I called them out for not following their own community rules:

Please be nice to other members. Anyone not being nice will be banned. Keep it fun, respectful and just be awesome to each other.

and they deleted their account.

[โ€“] MonkeyDatabase@lemmy.world 28 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (50 children)

What was wrong with them removing your comment? You were being annoying ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ

Their response seemed perfectly measured to someone being needlessly pedantic.

Edit: And also Shuts down? Did you miss the 'down'? Was the title edited after the fact? What does the rest of that modlog say? The screenshot is cropped.

My perspective is you were being annoying, got downvoted/called out, feigned shock, got your comments removed, and now you're on a bitter smear campaign.

This is the weakest accusation of mod abuse I've seen. Good grief.

[โ€“] lvxferre@mander.xyz 53 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (30 children)

Yes, their comment was extremely annoying, both in tone (whining) and content (TL;DR: "pls spoonfeed me basic reading comprehension"). If the mod simply removed the comment, or issued an official warning, it would be 100% warranted.

However, what the non-mod user is saying ITT about moderator abuse is still spot on. The mod in question answered to the whining in tone, tried to cover their own arse with content removal, and then went to whine in Mastodon about the events, or the fact that there's transparency functionality in Lemmy (the mod log) against the exact same behaviour that they showed there.

So it's a case where both sides were wrong but given their relative positions the mod being wrong is a bigger deal.

[โ€“] prosp3kt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah I would ban 24 hours and continue with life.

[โ€“] lvxferre@mander.xyz 1 points 3 weeks ago

I'd probably issue an official warning, then see how the poster reacts. I feel like 1d bans are mostly useful when you got the flamewar already going on, between two otherwise contributive members, and you need them to chill their heads.

That's up to mod style though. It's possible that your approach works better than mine, dunno, I almost never rely on short bans.

load more comments (28 replies)
load more comments (47 replies)
load more comments (55 replies)