this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2024
168 points (98.3% liked)

World News

38979 readers
2690 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/40688586

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hark@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Americans will point at China subsidizing EV production as unfair while giving a $7500 tax credit per American EV sold for a decade or so now.

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Those credits applied to any EV sold in the US previously and with the new extension, apply to any EV built in North America regardless of whether the manufacturer is domestic or foreign owned. What are you even talking about?

China's subsidies only apply to Chinese owned companies. They're doing exactly what you're attempting to accuse the US of doing, yet you seemingly have no problem with that. How odd.

[–] hark@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

The US had to make the change to only vehicles built in the US because up until recently, it's mostly only been the US and allied nations making the vast majority of EVs that could be sold in the US. Tesla has been sucking at the teat of the government through various subsidies, including the tax credit on purchases, carbon credits, cheap loans, and other programs.

I don't have a problem with the US subsidizing the EV industry, it's something that should absolutely be done. I take issue with people claiming it's only a problem because China has been doing it too. The fight against climate change should be a global one, we shouldn't be sabotaging it just for the sake of keeping local industry fat and happy when they've been dragging their feet this whole time.

Note the timing of these two events:

Apr 8, 2024 - Tesla Is Reportedly Canceling Plans to Build a Sub-$30K Compact SUV

May 22, 2024 - US says tariff increases on Chinese EVs, batteries and chips to start Aug. 1

Clearly Tesla knew the US was going to jack up tariffs on China and thought it safe to cancel the sub-$30k vehicle they had planned since the anti-competitive tariff kept his profits safe.

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 2 points 2 months ago

Tesla has been sucking at the teat of the government through various subsidies, including the tax credit on purchases, carbon credits, cheap loans, and other programs.

The $7500 credit is industry wide and available to any company that manufactures here, carbon credits are available to any company as well, and cheap loans were also available to any company because the interest rates were at historically low levels until the Fed finally raised them up in the past couple of years from the recession-level rates they'd been at since the 2008 recession.

China, on the other hand, is solely subsidizing their national companies at unsustainable levels and doing so to undercut prices in every foreign market in order to put competitors out of business. This is also aided by the fact that they have extremely lax environmental protection laws and don't shy away from using slave labor domestically. Once built, these cars would then be shipped halfway across the planet on some of the most heavily polluting methods available, container ships. What exactly is environmentally friendly about this? People just want cheap crap regardless of the outcome which is why companies like Walmart have been allowed to expand so large to become the largest employer in the world at the expense of millions of small local businesses that actually pay their employees well. This shit isn't good for anybody except those that run the show like the Waltons, and in this case, the Chinese government.