this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
661 points (93.8% liked)

Political Memes

5234 readers
2262 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Another reason to like Tim Walz. He has openly supported RCV: https://www.rcvbloomington.org/supporters

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Liz@midwest.social 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

As long as you had single-member districts, there will be a significant fraction of the voting population who have no one they can lobby who will listen. If I'm a Republican in a Democrat district, I don't have representation.

[–] SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

So what's the actual solution? Direct democracy?

[–] Liz@midwest.social 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I literally said the solution in my first comment? Multi-member districts. Each district has, say, five representatives and they're elected using some sort of proportional representation. Sequential Proportional Approval Voting is probably the best for the US. You can read up on the specifics of that method if you want, but in general any proportional method tries to take into account the fact that once a candidate gets into office, the people who voted for that candidate now have representation and some amount of satisfaction, so other people's opinions should be more heavily weighted when awarding the next seat. It's easiest to explain with party-based methods, but essentially, if the vote totals are 40% Team A, 40% Team B, and 20% Team C, then the winners should approximate that vote breakdown. In this case, 2:2:1. What it means is that minority populations are much more likely to have someone in office who faithfully represents them, but majority populations are still going to have the appropriate fraction of the seats in power.

[–] SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

First sentence is snippy. If you didn't want engagement then why did you bother responding?

Thank you for the information I'll dig into it on my way to work tomorrow.