this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
437 points (86.6% liked)

Memes

45197 readers
2376 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How is losing their equity fair on the leaving partner?

[–] Surface_Detail@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

They don't have equity to lose.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I'm arguing non-homeowner had zero risk and should have zero equity.

The non-homeowner put zero money down for the purchase, they put none of their credit at risk, they took on no liability for the property, and so far there's no mention of their obligation to pay for upkeep and repairs. Doing those things are the requirements of home ownership while the benefit is the equity. The non-homeowner simply hasn't done the things to be a home owner. If the did, then they'd be a home owner.