this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
448 points (94.8% liked)

linuxmemes

21172 readers
835 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

    • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    poopsmith@lemmy.world
    zephyr@lemmy.world
    rtxn@lemmy.world
    448
    My impression of github since switching to Linux (lemmy.world)
    submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by Alk@lemmy.world to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
    121 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     

    I've been transitioning to Linux recently and have been forced to use github a lot when I hadn't much before. Here is my assessment.

    Every github project is named something like dbutils, Jason's cool photo picker, or jibbly, and was forked from an abandoned project called EHT-sh (acronym meaning unknown) originally made by frederick lumberg, forked and owned by boops_snoops and actively maintained by Xxweeb-lord69xX.

    There are either 3 lines of documentation and no releases page, or a 15 page long readme with weekly releases for the last 15 years and nothing in between. It is either for linux, windows, or both. If it's for windows, they will not specify what platforms it runs on. If it's for Linux, there's a 50% chance there are no releases and 2 lines of commands showing how to build it (which doesn't work on your distro), but don't worry because your distro has it prepackaged 1 version out of date and it magically appears on flatpak only after you've installed it by other means. Everything is written in python2. It is illegal to release anything for Mac OS on github.

    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] skilltheamps@feddit.org 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

    When you're maintaining a product that is based on linux, you're surely qualified to port that thing to your platform yourself.

    Open source developers are thanklessly giving away their work for free already, and for the many things where there's just a github page it is just a one man show run in spare time. Don't demand them to give away even more of their time to cater for whatever distro you're using, just because you are not willing to invest the time to learn how linux works and also not willing to give a way a few megabytes for the dependencies they're developing against.

    All the discussions about things like distrobox and flatpak where linux novices express their dissatisfaction due to increased disk space are laughable. In the linux universe sole users have no power in deciding what goes, they do not pay anything and at worst pollute the bug tracker. Developers are what make up the linux universe, and what appeals to them is what is going to happen. Flatpak is a much more pleasant experience to develop for than a gazillion distros, hence this is where it is going, end of story. As a user either be happy with wherever the linux rollercoaster goes, or - if you want to see change- step up and contribute.

    [–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

    Why Linux will never be mainstream ^

    No...... It's the users that are wrong and stupid.

    [–] ricdeh@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

    Next time, try to engage rationally and in good faith with the commenter you are responding to :)

    [–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

    I did. Linux zealots can't handle the truth about regular users and they mostly do not and will not accommodate them. This conversation has been going on 40 years now.

    [–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

    Did you forget the part where everybody is getting it for free and devs aren't getting paid to do this shit? If you want your hand held, use Windows or MacOS.

    [–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Status quo it is.

    [–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 4 points 2 months ago

    So do something about it instead of expecting the rest of us to. Devs are people just like you. They have lives and real jobs.

    What is your solution?

    [–] snek@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

    I always felt like most users don't use Linux not because of any of the things you mentioned, nut because their first computer was a windows or mac.