this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2024
33 points (81.1% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3565 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 4 points 2 months ago (5 children)

"dont vote for anyone, that will solve our gaza problem"

[–] ashok36@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

It will! Trump will assume office, remove any restrictions on Israel, every palestinian will be killed or exiled, and the Gaza problem will finally be solved. A final solution, if you will.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Replace Israel with Russia and Gaza and Palestinians with Ukraine and Ukrainians and that will be how he also plans to "end" the war in Ukraine.

Simply the bigliest and best negotiator

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

During elections are one of the few times where public pressure can push our representatives toward policies that reflect the will of their constituents. The sentiment that demanding more from your representatives is tantamount to voting for the opposition, is a reactionary position. These are anti-genocide protestors advocating for the Democratic Administration to stop supporting and arming am ongoing genocide. This is not an unreasonable position. Demanding more from your representatives is fundamental to a functional democracy.

The overt fascism of the Republican party during this election cycle has galvanized the Democratic party to be more representative, and hopefully that continues on issues like Palestine and Immigration. Those will be critical for some of the critical swing states. The Uncommitted Movement is hundreds of thousands strong in Michigan. There are similar movements in Chicago and other states, all gaining momentum. These are committed Democratic voters, applying pressure to the administration that is supposed to represent them.

Trump is currently running as if he's the peace ticket, not because he actually is but because it's a good way to grab votes. The Democrats need to be the genuine peace ticket, for their own benefit and the relief of Palestinians trying to survive this genocide.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 8 points 2 months ago

The point isn't that not voting for harris is really an option. the point is to actually encourage the party to do the right thing. Least so far the "uncommited" group has been on the elections that dont' matter, the polls etc...

Point is you need some level of power. You don't exactly have a bargaining position when you walk up to the officials and say "stop killing people or I'll vote for you anyway". I mean I get it, we live in a fake democracy... we're given the choice of someone who's bad on the issue, or someone who's worse on the issue.

Honestly on the whole I applaud Harris, she's actually at least paying lip service to hearing people out, and pushing for a cease fire. It's the least you can do, but it's more than biden did, and there's at least an inkling of hope she'll actually follow it up.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Genocide advocates are so one-note. It's clear from your comment that you didn't even think about reading the article.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com -2 points 2 months ago

10-4 good buddy

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

"don't vote for anyone that will solve our gaza problem"