this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2024
419 points (97.5% liked)

World News

38956 readers
1968 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Darkard@lemmy.world 240 points 2 months ago (60 children)

"I didn't want the war to be in MY country!"

[–] Aielman15@lemmy.world 81 points 2 months ago (34 children)

You are underplaying the struggles of civilians in a war zone just because they happen to live on the wrong side of the border.

Civilians have all the rights to not want war on their country, at their doors, no matter which side of the border they are, and they are allowed to lament the incompetency of a government that hides critical information from them in an attempt to cover up its failures.

The Ukrainians have the right to keep fighting, and I hope they win this war. Putin is a criminal and he must pay for his crimes. This doesn't mean that civilians caught in the crossfire are being petty.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 81 points 2 months ago (28 children)

A lot of Russians support the war, though. Those deserve what they're getting. And they're very lucky it's the Ukrainians invading them, not the Russians.

[–] amanda@aggregatet.org 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

A lot of Americans supported the equally illegal invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, I still don’t think they deserve even how shitty their non-occupation civil government is.

Given how war works I’m almost certain there will be war crimes against the civil population here. Not as bad as what the Russians are doing in their occupied territories I sure as fuck hope and expect, but worse than anyone deserves. I can see Ukrainians getting to be a bit vindictive etc about this, they’ve earned it, but as armchair commentators online at a safe distance we should fucking show some empathy for people in a shitty situation they have very little control over.

I can’t control my government and I live in a democracy. I don’t blame Russians for most of what their state does either.

[–] diskmaster23@lemmy.one 2 points 2 months ago

That's a stretch to call the USA a democracy with all tactics to keep right-wingers in power.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's some serious revisionist history to claim the invasion of Afghanistan was illegal. How do you define what's an "illegal" invasion anyway?

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

UN law. Oh, look, turns out those don't apply to Security Council members if they don't want them to, weird.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca -3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The UN is a forum for diplomacy to happen. It's not the fucking world police LOL.

International law is just a collection of treaties that countries may or may not have signed on to. Russia's invasion of Ukraine could be considered an illegal invasion because it violated treaties.

There was no such treaty prohibiting the US from invading Afghanistan, in fact there were UN security council resolutions in support of it, here's some light reading for you on the UN supporting combating terrorism in Afghanistan after 9/11: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_Resolution_1386

While there isn't actually a world police, NATO is the closest thing to it. 9/11 triggered Article 5 of NATO, so basically Al Qaeda punched the world police in the face and the Taliban tried to protect their Al Qaeda buddies.

Also remember the Taliban wasn't recognized as the government by the UN. So in "UN law" terms, NATO was going into Afghanistan to support the UN recognized government (The Northern Alliance, previously called the Mujaheddin) against a terrorist group (al Qaeda) and their allies (Taliban). This was done with explicit endorsement by the UN security council.

Maybe you should read up on international law, it's a little more complex than you're assuming it to be. There are actually justifications for military action, like when a terrorist group attacks another country. Afghanistan also may be more complicated than you think with all the various factions within the country.

[–] JTskulk@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The big thing I remember hearing at the time was that it was an illegal war because Congress didn't declare war and only they can. I thought the Russians calling their invasion of Ukraine a special military operation was a slightly tongue in cheek jab at the US since that's basically what we called the invasion of Afghanistan.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

The big thing I remember hearing at the time was that it was an illegal war because Congress didn’t declare war and only they can.

That's just internet nonsense. Nobody declares war anymore, because it's going from zero to a hundred in an instant and it's difficult to back down from. Which is something that could lead to World War 3 which is widely seen to be a bad thing. It's all about escalation so there can be de-escalation if things seem like it's getting out of hand.

Post-WWII, congress does what's called an Authorization of Use of Force. Which is effectively the same thing if you're worried about upsetting the dead slave masters that wrote the constitution. And there was an authorization for use of force for Afghanistan.

I thought the Russians calling their invasion of Ukraine a special military operation was a slightly tongue in cheek jab at the US since that’s basically what we called the invasion of Afghanistan.

Nope, it was called the "Global War on Terror" from the very beginning. The US did not avoid the use of the word war. The "special operation" bullshit is just a Putin propaganda thing.

load more comments (25 replies)
load more comments (30 replies)
load more comments (55 replies)