this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2024
789 points (91.8% liked)

Memes

45575 readers
1828 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BirdyBoogleBop@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 2 months ago (24 children)

Digital isn't better it's just different. Also a tonne of wristwatches are still analogue.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (9 children)

It absolutely is tho. Usually more precise, 1:1 translatable into written text, can use the superior 24h system and uses the same reading system that is already taught in school anyways.

[–] r00ty@kbin.life 5 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Right! Just to prove a point, I am going to make an NTP enabled rolex, and sync it to my microsecond accurate local NTP server! :P

[–] Incandemon@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

To be fair, I did have a watch that automatically synced itself to the us naval observatories atomic clocks over the air.

[–] r00ty@kbin.life 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, but you need to factor in the distance to the transmitter. Going to add at least a few microseconds to your time accuracy!

[–] Unforeseen@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Latency is accounted for in the sync process

[–] r00ty@kbin.life 3 points 2 months ago

Sync process? The other comment was talking about the old receivers for the atomic clocks on SW/MW frequencies. It was a one way thing.

Now in theory if a receiver also had GPS they could account for the distance. But, then they'd get far more accurate time from the GPS receiver so..

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)