this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
355 points (92.8% liked)

Greentext

4389 readers
1448 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] phuntis@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

4 is not even remotely great it is genuinely awful 3 is fine I won't insult 3 I enjoyed it not as much as nv I loved nv but I enjoyed it it was good even but 4 is an insult

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 2 points 3 months ago

4 is a great shooter. It's a terrible RPG.

[–] BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

wow really cause i played 4 and it was a great time because the game was great. you must have a very high standard. never played a single game under 90 score on metacritic (but that would mean new vegas is worse than 4)

[–] Zanudous@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

As a big fan of fallout, imo, 4 is the weakest of series. Engine was outdated, repeated time wasting quests, boring world building, the base building was their new exciting feature but it fell kinda flat. Now with 1k+ mods game can actually be a lot fun though. Also 74 didn't exist.